Who is funding prop 32

Other political expenditures remain unrestricted, including corporate expenditures from available resources not limited by payroll deduction prohibition. Prohibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or officer-controlled committees. Unions, corporations, and government contractors would be subject to additional campaign finance restrictions. A NO vote on this measure means: There would be no change to existing laws regulating the ability of unions and corporations to use money deducted from an employee's paycheck for political purposes.

Unions, corporations, and government contractors would continue to be subject to existing campaign finance laws.

Bans contributions from corporations AND unions to politicians. Prohibits contributions from government contractors. Stops payroll withholding for politics, making ALL contributions voluntary. Vote YES to clean up Sacramento. It's unfair, unbalanced, and won't take money out of politics.

The League of Women Voters urges a No vote! Supported by small business owners, farmers, educators, and taxpayers. Campaign Finance Data Who contributes? What is spent? Click on "Proposition 32", then on a ballot committee to see detail. Enter only your zip code into our lookup to find a meeting in your area. The content is provided by organizations unaffiliated with Smart Voter and its partners, and no endorsement of any views expressed or guarantee of its accuracy is intended or implied.

This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page. Voters Beware: Special interests have spent tens of millions of dollars to prevent Prop. The fact is both unions and corporations fund independent political committees protected by the Constitution that cannot be banned. No exceptions. It goes as far as the U. Constitution allows to end special interest influence in state government. I urge you to vote Yes on Prop.

Fat-cat lobbyists attend these fundraisers and hand over tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions. Most happen when hundreds of bills are up for votes, allowing politicians and special interests to trade favors:. Knox vs. Today, it is legal for politicians to give contracts to political donors, shutting out small businesses in the process.

Yes on 32! The official arguments in opposition to Proposition 32 presented in the state's official voter guide were submitted by Jennifer A. Real campaign reform treats everyone equally, with no special exemptions for anyone. Proposition 32 was intentionally written to exempt thousands of big businesses like Wall Street investment firms, hedge funds, developers, and insurance companies. Over of the companies exempted by this measure are listed as Major Donors by the California Secretary of State.

This measure says it prohibits unions from using payrolldeducted funds for political purposes. It says it also applies to corporations, so it sounds balanced.

Just take a look at the official summary. You can see the imbalance from this line: 'Other political expenditures remain unrestricted, including corporate expenditures from available resources not limited by payroll deduction prohibition.

Many top contributors to Proposition 32 are former insurance company executives, Wall Street executives, developers, and big money donors to causes which benefit from Prop. Sacramento has too much partisan bickering and gridlock. The money spent on political campaigns has caused all of us to mistrust the political campaign system. The sponsors of Proposition 32 are trying to use our anger and mistrust to change the rules for their own benefit.

Restricting unions and their workers while not stopping corporate special interests will result in a political system that favors corporate special interests over everyone else.

It is nothing but a corporate power grab, the kind California voters have already rejected twice first in and again in Proposition 32, a measure appearing on the November statewide ballot, is not what it seems. Skip to main content Skip to site navigation. Prop 32 Tag January 24, Article December 1, Elections Prop 30 Prop Romero and other backers say Proposition 32 would align California with federal law, which has long blocked direct corporate or union contributions to candidates.

While corporations have been big players in California ballot initiatives, they have avoided making independent expenditures in partisan races. A psychology professor at Cal State Los Angeles and a member of the California Faculty Association, Romero clashed frequently with unions during her years in the legislature.

The powerful California Teachers Association endorsed her successful opponent, Tom Torlakson, during the race for state schools superintendent.